We Get Mail: “……ma’am, do either I or my baby look like hospital employees to you?”

Yeah, I don’t understand how I got to be so lucky, but I thought you might enjoy the following email I received today:

V-mail is inspected for flaws on an enlarging "reader" at the Pentagon building, Washington, D.C. V-mail is only 1/65th the weight of ordinary mail and saves ninety-eight percent of the cargo space required for ordinary letters. 1,600 letters can be placed on a roll of film little larger than a pack of cigarettes

“War on Terra detected like a red spot on Jupiter, a spinning occurrence detectable in currents or temptable!

Superman “bizarro world” revealed in “Good is Guy Died”: Party gossip for chuckles (and one-time project, getting 100k, 500k, too, see upperandlowercase.com): bad Friday, guy died, good Sunday, something about controlling death.

So Halloween, Mary with baby Jesus and a watch is welcome for All Saints Eve, but bad Friday, good Sunday, who’s “of the other”?

Eve droppers?

Dialogue: Poor mothers, vulnerable after childbirth.. demanded of them first nicely with colorable words (shifting meaning, unsettled meaning), but a demand rarely waived nonetheless (increasing babyfund by 100,000, for ‘instantly’ naming a complex human, the most complex organism on earth), ’sign on this line called ‘Informant’ and ’sign that the maiden name gave birth, wife name was merely witness’:

……ma’am, do either I or my baby look like hospital employees to you?

BUT YOU’RE REQUIRED TO NAME THAT THING (who else could, you’re required) AND WE CAN TREAT AS THING LATER THAT THING. SO WHAT IF THE LINE READS INFORMANT.

…….fire me. I didn’t name the heartburn in my tummy. Big deal. I wanted to wait, while not naming a lump of heartburn. Why should I hafta forgive the child, by informing, and forgive the child I’m naming during the naming, ‘buy’ the way.

OKAY. THEN LET’S TRY THIS. I’M REQUIRED TO ASK FOR THAT NAME (who else could inform on a neighbor, or name the ’subject’ on birth certificate name changes later in life, for name-inquiry I’m required unless you have a nonpublic nurse, noncommercial nurse per Article IX, bill of rights to the U.S. Constitution, if using only constitutional language for explaining a fertilized human ovum as U.S. Attorneys successfully prevail in arguing at U.S. Supreme Court against parentally asserted privileges to terminating life) BUT I LACK A NAME AND I’M AUTHORIZED TO ASK FOR THAT NAME FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT.

……..so ask. If you get fired unless you ask, then simply ask and certify that you asked.

LOOK, WE’d SAY THE SAME TO ALL YOUR NEIGHBORS AND WE’LL SAY THE SAME TO YOU: YOU CAN’T TAKE ‘that’ BABY FROM ‘this’ HOSPITAL UNLESS WE HAVE A NAME.

Let’s get this straight: That offer of yours’ll cost you 100,000, American, if you want your offer accepted.

SURE, 500,000 DOLLARS, WHATEVER YOU SAY, LADY. DON’T MAKE ME CALL THE POLICE.

Seriously, ma’am, you may have a name instantly conceived of this room’s events, like dances with wolves, but that’ll cost you 100,000 American.

ARE YOU TRYING TO TRAP ME INTO A 100,000 CONTRACT. I DON’T WANNA CALL THE POLICE ‘ON’ YOU.

Glad to explain. If this child gets named sits-with-squirrels, I gotta wait until I see squirrels and you don’t let squirrels in hospitals. Dances with wolves? You gonna let wolves in here so I can make a legal determination after childbirth while I’m still exhausted, vulnerable, dehydrated from silly ice chips and dizzy and and and and.. That offer of yours’ll cost you 100,000 dollars if you want your offer accepted. If my father were here, he’d… he’d… I’m a Christian woman so I won’t say in mixed company what he’d do to you, but you wouldn’t like it.

SURE, 500,000 DOLLARS, WHATEVER YOU SAY, LADY. I’M CALLING THE POLICE.

Was that on the informed consent that I signed? By the way, I’m recording this on an audio recorder and everyone in the room may feel suspicious when your attorney insists this conversation never happened at great peril to a bar card.

I’M CALLING THE POLICE.

I’ll call the police for you, on this cell phone, neighbor, since on your federal constitution, Article I, Section 10, impairing obligation of contracts is unlawful, so using firearms is on the informed consent for pregnant mothers, right?

SEE? THE POLICE IS HERE. NOW SIGN. YOU KNOW IT’S A POLICE STATE WHEN THE CARS READ ‘POLICE’ ON THE SIDE.

Officer, we can have pie and lemonade after this if you visit my baby, but any judge, as you can see, can judge this, from this nurse’s bold ’sure, 500,000, whatever you say’ that the nurse continues supporting before your very eyes. A judge will take the 500,000 that this nurse settled from either the nurse’s wages, or the hospital with a till levy, or, now that the nurse has involved you, your wages, per Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, which makes unlawful impairing the obligations of contract, and that definitely includes this nurse’s 500,000 dollar contract also. A claim of impaired contract against bonds you all hold, maybe from there, but you can see what’s predictably successful here is pie and lemonade for everybody to be reasoned, rather than unreasoned, after I get home and settled in. If corporation presidents can wait six months for sentencing because of hardship on family, I can go home and heal from my episiotomy, maybe, if you’ll please mind my vulnerability here, around staph infections. I would’ve explained my position with the words, “Why are you doing this,” but that would’ve been unclear consent. Thanks, Neighbors, that you’ve other than waived your rights to the same constitutionally protected contract.

What this e-mail proposes (100k, 500k, or waiving the funds from instantly naming your weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! little babe) does help fund your children, braces, college, etc., of parents at America — an estimated 7.5 million emails per day from three different servers — after all, just because an auditor or nurse glibly submit/selfsubject under procedures unsettled (unsettled meaning of each word) means what, glibness? Peer pressure and paranoid employees, reading deeply at a frown from bosses, reading glibly at a smile from bosses?

Emotional support is available in your community for preparing against playground peer pressure.

Oh look! A wheelbarrow of cash available from this e-mail for ‘dis-charging the charge’ for a loaf of bread using neg value (monetized debt instead of monetized value) paper! No more worries near addressing taxes, an abundance of negative value paper!

Just because an auditor or nurse gladly submit/selfsubject under procedures unsettled (unsettled meaning of each word) means what – glibness? Superficiality digging no deeper than ‘did the guy stop frowning at me and start smiling? Can I stop reading now?’ Peer pressure, smiles and frowns, smiles and frowns, unsettled meaning for each word, inferers! Stop inferring! Start communicating instead of inferring!

Or, instead of accepting 500,000 for instant naming, from one insisting upon your accepting their offer for 100k, 500k, do the instant naming anyway, but please do whatever it is that you can do for letting Malachi 3:10 live rather than let Malachi 3:10 increase debt in the house of God by monetized debt (human capital model, Mr. Blair cited in plain sight, using summit language).

To instant naming anyway, that you can choose anytime during the same script anyway, by just giving up under the peer pressure midway or somewhere in between, then yoking baby (us) by literally bastardizing (illegitimizing) baby, salvaged bastard child certificate of the state, for neg value fed reserve notes, collateralizing so nations accept neg value money (monetized debt instead of monetized value) ————- that’s what the tour guide at William Hearst Castle gladly tells tourists (to get our, the people’s, waiver) was William Hearst’s contribution to the world, a gambling bet used for profit ————– mere statistics of life expectancy cradle to grave for a 10-million-dollar collateralization on each birth certificate for interest-bearing until death, cradle to grave, profiting the nations and trackable on CUSIP stock-market trading (the number on the second side of each social security card is the bond number trackable), but never letting parents do the same by having sufficient money at a birth, such as the idea of what this e-mail proposes does help fund painting for the child’s room, braces, college, et cetera.
–
Truth is reality. That means don’t stretch reality, don’t bend reality, don’t poke reality — what did reality ever do to you? Who has a strong need for the mark ‘of’ the wild American cashcow, I get plasma tv/food, but you get neg value? Can’t buy/sell food or cars unless a specific collateralized mark ‘of’ the wild American, huh.. I get plasma tv, you get neg value seems to require an apology for rest, Forrest. Apology biggest at tithing, with smiles and frowns at tithing, as the only meter for ‘did I bring wholly the tithe’ while monetized debt increases debt in the house of God. You know, Noah’s rainbow only promised no flood, not no destruction.

Any blacklash, in the form of policy changes (for policy agents (police) or hospital agents), against this e-mail is merely a backlash against Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, and not a backlash against a position other than the position of Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, under which a few of us self-subjected (to uphold) and a few of us elected otherwise. ‘No state shall make law impairing obligations of contracts’ (from Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, using plain English and everything, and, so, who needs an attorney to read a menu).

stomp stomp stomp on the paly playground (until pie and lemonade is offered for the first time that it is ears ever heard pie and lemonade offered, perhaps, American): What this e-mail proposes does help fund painting for the child’s room, braces, college, et cetera and against fruits of the spirit there can be no law (a law against pie? A law against pi, when each gets a slice lawfully, with infinite pies for all, rather than assuming that I automatically lose when you get a slice?). Harvesting unborns? But it’s the trend! If you disagree, or dislike unlimited harvestings, accept the offers of birthing assistants, for babyfund (minus namecalling, and that also includes names such as “childish” and/or “supremely intelligent” both evading the topic at hand for micro-political gain of polit-eness for pol-icy (a second agenda off topic, in other words.))

Ask your local mental health professional for assistance against the fiercest opponent since time started: peer pressure and paranoid employees who glibly unsettled the meaning for each word. Your local economist, who gets livelihood from monetized debt, has information regarding whether or not (yes/no) little units of monetized debt are used today for food, at the market for product “sale”/”buy” attempts using only negative value monetized debt since computers can’t calculate zero value paper. How can I pay a debt with a debt? Is every monthly credit card statement using the word “pay” asserting an impossibility if only monetized debt circulates? How can I pay a debt if using only debt instruments? Do I have a right to pay, using monetized value rather than dis-charge charges, and a right to give nondebt, like kings and queens throwing IOUs around luxuriously avoided, to pay debt like the bible states, leave no debt outstanding but the debt of love? Already bankrupt and using funny money (never-cashed-out casino chips are promises to pay, debt instruments) how can we go bankrupt twice without foreclosure upon the assets, the children unborn? The source for the interest, on negative value, that computers can calculate, harvested from unborns based upon life expectancy (“banking on it,” as it were). “Please specify, using written form, the method available to me for ‘paying, without waiving a right, the amount that you specify’ since, if the law is on your side, you need no waivers of the right to pay debt; if you other than specify, using written form, the method available to me for ‘paying, without waiving a right, without waiving a right of any sort, an amount that you specify’ it is presumable and presumed from your silence that you have forgiven ‘the’ debt.”

QUESTION: Into what does my honesty extend in the example below.
Offering pie and lemonade before accepting a carrot-and-stick offer allows carrot-and-stick offers to be viewed objectively, rather than binding both viewers’ every thought automatically. For example, since I can hardly eat diamonds, gold, silver, or paper monetized debt, accepting an offer of monetized debt or gold or silver or diamonds for my food is a carrot-and-stick or a diamond for food? Injecting a carrot-and-stick scenario between two people is who, because the constitutional servants are allocated funds for the opposite, Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, “No state shall make law impairing obligations of contract.” So while a neighbor, Evan, disregarding reality, asserts “kiss the constitution goodbye” I offer my text that you just finished reading, instead. Why? Whether on your front porch or at a courtroom, who can point to a law for impairing? Riots if you try, simply because someone’s asking “who can point to a law for impairing obligations of contracts?”

So continue, neighbor Evan, with neighbor Evan’s brainwashing for fear, or read the same words again and kick out the old wineskins (paradigms) for new wine in new wine skins, play it out like GI JOE and BARBIE in your head to finality, like a poker game, or you ignored the text that you just read, unjustly ignoring the text that you may have just read. Evan has since chuckled.

To respect myself I had to try, for Malachi 3:10 not increasing debt (monetized debt in the house of God), and for safety for each of you to simply discuss that, rather than accept without discussion (like “bad Friday, guy dies, good Sunday” backwards) like robots, since angels are rumored robots without free will and the creator was bored with robots, wanted family, wanted peers, wanted neighbors who knew both good and evil and chose good, like a vaccine for choosing good (wanted friends, poor invisible guy).

How rude is dying, saying, “I know I never spoke with you, but I’m just.. I need a body and I’m gonna crash on your lawn for eternity, hope you don’t mind, until I get a body.” Perhaps a better prayer, prey, is, “Increasing debt in the house of God is Malachi 3:10 with monetized debt? Who permanently killed Malachi 3:10, beyond resurrectability, so that we can never access Malachi 3:10, ever, at all, no matter how much anyone wants accessing Malachi 3:10? Until Malachi 3:10 is accessible, Revelation 18:4-5 is also stolen from us, dear author for Malachi 3:10 and author for Revelation 18:4-5, so who’s crazy now, or am I just talking to myself. Who’s crazy now! Who stole Malachi 3:10 beyond resurrectability, owe Word Made Flesh, or am I just talking to myself, using red for symbolizing the blood forcefully taken from me, where my heart restarted alone in a cell for Malachi 3:10 after I was murdered? Born 9-11-1972 at Bronx, New York, 10:10 a.m., can make ‘they love us for our freedoms’ contagious, where freed speech nonarrestees are without multiple poisonings through handcuffs for court transport to take a man’s mind, without multiple electrocutions, without multiple bleedings into toilets from poisonings, but instead Malachi 3:10 was stolen from us beyond resurrectability, unless babyfund lets durable food packets be used for tithing; you know, give to God what is God’s and give to Ceasar what is Ceasar’s, since William Hearst doesn’t need a name for informing or William Hearst would already have a name for informing, and for subjects on birth certificate name changes later in life, would already have the name, so give to William Hearst instant naming and give to God what is God’s, owing respect for separation of church and state — or am I just talking to myself without gain. Who permanentized Malachi 3:10’s nullification, no matter how much ANYONE wants Malachi 3:10? Who’s crazy now!”

upperandlowercase.com

As a certified shorthand reporter of 12 years’ time (CSR 11417 California), having served at federal grand jury also, and former certified shorthand instructor (CRI), I am disabled since the harms imposed against me, filed low-amount claims, but was told selfsubjected county, city, state, couldn’t pay (though my claims were “deemed complete” at CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 124).

I am in serious need (12/4/2008) facing eviction; please send donations for:

William Ligiu Ionescu
c/o 27702 Crown Valley Parkway
Bldg. D-4, #415
Ladera Ranch, California 92694
America the Beautiful

So Halloween, Mary with baby Jesus and a watch is welcome for All Saints Eve, but bad Friday, good Sunday, who’s “of the other”?

(Photograph courtesy of The Library of Congress)